DCIT, EXEMPTION, GHAZIABAD vs. DIVYA YOG MANDIR TRUST, HARIDWAR
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the additions. It relied on the High Court's and Supreme Court's decisions in the assessee's own case for prior assessment years, which held that the Assessing Officer was not justified in denying exemption.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust, registered under section 12A, claimed exemption under section 11. The Assessing Officer denied exemption, holding that the trust's activities were not covered under section 2(15) and made additions based on business profits and inter-trust donations.
What were the issues?
Whether the trust is eligible for exemption under Section 11/12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and if its activities fall within the ambit of Section 2(15).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DEHRADUN CIRCUIT BENCH: DEHRADUN
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE
PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM
This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order dated 20/02/2018 passed by CIT(A) , Dehradun in A.Y. 2014-15.
The grounds of appeal are as under:-
“1. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and facts in deleting the additions of Rs. 4,18,82,260/- made by the AO in respect of profit from business undertakings.
2. The order of Ld. CIT(A) be cancelled and the order o the AO be restored.”
The assessee trust was registered u/s 12A(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 vide order dated 27.03.1995. The assessee trust has been filing its return of income regularly and claiming exemption in terms of section 11,12 and 12AA of the Act. The assessee Trust furnished its return of income on 28.11.2014 declaring Rs. 1,38,130/- income after claiming exemption u/s 11 of the Act. The assessee also filed its Audit Report u/s 12A(a) in Form No. 10B. The Assessing Officer on examination of the audit report observed that the assessee trust was engaged in business activities. Therefore, the Assessing Officer after setting off the loss incurred by the Trust from the profits of business undertakings, the total excess of income over expenditure had been shown at Rs. 4,17,00,246/-. The Assessing Officer further observed that the said amount was claimed by the assessee as inter trust donations to the tune of Rs. 78,69,23,236/- to various related trust/institutions having common members. The Assessing Officer held that activities of trust are not covered u/s 2(15) of the Act and not allowed it exemption u/s 11 of the Act, thereby calculating the total income at Rs. 4,18,82,260.
Being aggrieved by the Assessment Order, the assessee filed appeal before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) allowed the appeal of the assessee.
The Ld. DR relied upon the Assessment Order and submitted that the CIT(A) erred in deleting the additions of Rs. 4,18,82,260/- made by the Assessing Officer in respect of profit from business undertakings.
The Ld. AR relied upon the order of the CIT (A) and further submitted that the Hon’ble Uttarakhand High Court in assessee’s case vide order dated 27.02.2019 in of 2014 held that the Assessing Officer was not justified in denying the assessee exemption under Section 11/12 of the Act. The said decision of the Hon’ble High Court is confirmed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) Diary No(s). 25556/2019 order dated 09.08.2019.
We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. The Hon’ble Uttarakhand High Court in Assessee’s case for A.Y. 2009- 10 has held that the Assessing Officer was not justified in denying the assessee exemption under Section 11/12 of the Act which is confirmed by the Hon’ble Apex Court. Besides this, for A.Y. 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14 as well the Tribunal has decided the identical issue in favour of the assessee. There is no change in facts in the present assessment year and no distinguishing facts were pointed out by the Ld. DR. Therefore, the CIT(A) rightly allowed the appeal of the assessee. There is no need to interfere with the findings of the CIT(A). Hence, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
In result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in Open Court on 18th Dec., 2020 in presence of both parties.
Order pronounced in the Open Court on this 18th Day of December, 2020.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026