← Back to search

KABIR DUBEY,NOIDA vs. ITO (1) RANGE CODE 100 CIRCLE 5(1)(1) G B NAGAR, NOIDA

PDF
ITA 2296/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 June 20253 pages

Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARAAssessment Year: 2020-21

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2020-21, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/Addl./JCIT(A)-
7,
Mumbai’s
DIN and order no.
ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-
25/1073806311(1), dated 28.02.2025 involving proceedings under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
2. Coming to the assessee’s first and foremost argument seeking to reverse both the learned lower authorities’ action disallowing its ESI/EPF contribution of Rs. 15,57,375/-, it is noticed that the Assessee by Sh. Ajit Kumar Jha, Adv.
Department by Sh. Akhilesh Kumar Yadav, Sr. DR
Date of hearing
03.06.2025
Date of pronouncement
03.06.2025
2 | P a g e hon’ble apex court’s recent landmark decision in Checkmate
Services Pvt Ltd Vs. CIT [2022] 143 taxmann.com 278 (SC) has already settled the issue in the department’s favour that the same ought to be deposited on or before the due date in the corresponding statute than that of filing of section 139(1) return.
The assessee fails in it’s instant first and foremost ground in very terms.
3. Next comes equally important aspect of assessee’s compliance to the foregoing statutory provision going by the actual date of salary disbursement, which has not been adjudicated by both the learned authorities. I thus deem it appropriate in the larger interest of justice to restore the assessee’s instant grievance to this limited extent to the learned Assessing Officer for his afresh appropriate factual verification subject to a rider that the assessee shall itself plead and prove at his own risk and responsibility that it had complied with the foregoing provision, going by the actual date of monthly salary disbursement in consequential proceedings.
Ordered accordingly.
4. This assessee’s appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes.
3 | P a g e

Order pronounced in the open court on 3rd June, 2025 (SATBEER SINGH GODARA)
JUDICIAL MEMBER

Dated: 3rd June, 2025. RK/-

KABIR DUBEY,NOIDA vs ITO (1) RANGE CODE 100 CIRCLE 5(1)(1) G B NAGAR, NOIDA | BharatTax