BAHRI ESTATES PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 4(4), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for VSVS and settled the dispute by paying the tax. Therefore, the findings of the CIT(Appeals) on merits were set aside, and the appeal was treated as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against the order of CIT(Appeals) sustaining a disallowance under Section 37. The assessee claimed to have opted for VSVS 2020 and paid the tax due, a fact that was allegedly omitted by the CIT(Appeals).
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal should be treated as withdrawn given their settlement under VSVS 2020, despite the CIT(Appeals) order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “A” NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD & SHRI M BALAGANESH
सुनवाईक�तारीख/ Date of hearing: 03.06.2025 03.06.2025 उ�ोषणाक�तारीख/Pronouncement on आदेश /O R D E R PER C.N. PRASAD, J.M.
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi dated 27.09.2024 for the AY 2012-13 in sustaining the disallowance of Rs.20,25,000/- made u/s 37 of the Act. In spite of issue of notice, none appeared on behalf of the assessee, nor any adjournment was moved.
On perusal of the grounds of appeal
of the assessee we observe that the Ld. CIT(Appeals) appears to have disposed of the appeal ex parte. In the grounds of appeal the assessee contended that no hearing notice was served on the assessee. In ground no. 6 of the grounds of appeal the assessee contended that it had opted under VSVS 2020 and paid tax after issuing Form
3. However, it appears that this fact was omitted to consider by the Ld. CIT(Appeals) and the appeal of the assessee was dismissed sustaining the disallowance made u/s 37 of the Act. The record before us shows that the Revenue issued Form 3 dated 11.02.2021 determining the tax payable on disputed disallowance and the assessee also paid the tax due of Rs.2,94,752/- for which Form 4 was also issued. Therefore, since the assessee had opted under VSVS and settled the dispute, we set aside the findings of the Ld. CIT(Appeals) on merits. The appeal filed by the assessee is treated as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 03.06.2025
More judgments on Section 37
- Mohammed Javed Bhati, Sikar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, SikarITA 994/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle… vs Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company…ITA 933/AHD/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle… vs Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company…ITA 932/AHD/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle… vs Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company…ITA 931/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company… vs The ACIT, Circle-2(1)(1), VadodaraITA 768/AHD/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026