CHANDRAKANT SHIVARAM DHORE,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 9(3), PUNE
Facts
The assessee is an individual who did not file his return of income. Information was received by the department regarding the sale of an immovable property by the assessee on 04.03.2014. The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A)/NFAC was dismissed due to a delay of 573 days.
Held
The Tribunal noted that the appeal before the CIT(A)/NFAC was dismissed solely on the grounds of delay. The merits of the case were not considered by the lower appellate authority.
Key Issues
Whether the appeal filed before the CIT(A)/NFAC should be admitted despite the delay, or if the delay should be condoned for adjudication on merits.
Sections Cited
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & Ms. ASTHA CHANDRA
PER R.K. PANDA, VP:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 16.06.2025 of the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC, Delhi relating to assessment year 2014-15. 2. Although a number of grounds have been raised by the assessee, however, these all relate to the order of the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC in dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee on account of delay of 573 days.
Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual and has not filed his return of income. Information was available with the department that the assessee along with others had sold an immovable property vide registered deed dated 04.03.2014 registered before the Sub-