OPINDER SINGH MARWAH,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 62(1), NEW DELHI

PDF
ITA 2618/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 February 2022AY 2015-163 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “E” NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA

Hearing: 21.02.2022

I.T.A.No.2618/Del/2019

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “E” NEW DELHI

BEFORE SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.2618/Del/2019 िनधा�रणवष�/Assessment Year: 2015-16 बनाम Opinder Singh Marwah DCIT Shop No. 24, Andrews Ganj Vs. Circle 62(1) Market, New Delhi. New Delhi. PAN No. AAKPM6200G अपीलाथ� Appellant ��यथ�/Respondent

Sh. Arun Kishore, CA िनधा�रतीक�ओरसे /Assessee by Sh. Gaurav Pundir, Sr. DR राज�वक�ओरसे /Revenue by

सुनवाईक�तारीख/ Date of hearing: 21.02.2022 25.02.2022 उ�ोषणाक�तारीख/Pronouncement on आदेश /O R D E R PER C.N. PRASAD, J.M.

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of Ld.

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-38, New Delhi dated 22.01.2019 for the AY 2015-16.

2.

At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that the Ld. CIT(Appeals) dismissed the appeal ex-parte and the dismissal of the

appeal is illegal, unjust and against the principles of natural justice. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that in spite of request of

I.T.A.No.2618/Del/2019

adjournment by the assessee the Ld. CIT(Appeals) disposed off the

appeal. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that the assessee

sought for an adjournment for a little longer period so as to enable the

assessee to furnish the documents in support of its claim and issues.

However, the Ld. CIT(Appeals) granted a short adjournment and

ultimately disposed off the appeal without giving proper opportunity to

the assessee to furnish his submissions. The Ld. DR has no objection in

sending back the appeal filed by the Ld. CIT(Appeals) for considering the

appeal afresh on merits.

3.

On hearing both the parties and perusing the orders of the Ld.

CIT(Appeals) we are of the considered view that this appeal has to go

back to the file of the Ld. CIT(Appeals) for fresh hearing and disposal of

appeal on merits in the interest of justice as adequate opportunity was

not given to the assessee. Thus, we restore this appeal to the file of the

Ld. CIT(Appeals) to dispose off on merits after providing adequate

opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

4.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 25/02/2022

Sd/- Sd/- (PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA) (C.N. PRASAD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 25/02/2022 Delhi. 2

I.T.A.No.2618/Del/2019

*Kavita Arora, Sr. P.S. Copy of order sent to- Assessee/AO/Pr. CIT/ CIT (A)/ ITAT (DR)/Guard file of ITAT. By order

Assistant Registrar, ITAT: Delhi Benches-Delhi