ITO (E), WARD-2(3), NEW DELHI vs. TIMES CENTRE FOR MEDIA AND MANAGEMENT , NEW DELHI

PDF
ITA 7444/DEL/2017Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 February 2022AY 2014-153 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & DR. BRR KUMAR

For Respondent: Shri H.K. Chaudhary, CIT(DR), Shri Ved Jain & Shri Ashish
Hearing: 28.02.2022Pronounced: 28.02.2022

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI

BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & DR. BRR KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

ITA No.7444/Del/2017 Assessment Year: 2014-15

ITO(E), Ward-2(3), Vs. Times Centre for Media and New Delhi. Management, Room No. 2407, E-2- Block, Dr. SOM Civic Centre, New Delhi-1100 02

PAN :AAACT3554H (Appellant) (Respondent)

Revenue by Shri H.K. Chaudhary, CIT(DR) Respondent by S/Shri Ved Jain & Shri Ashish Sachdeva, Adv. Date of hearing 28.02.2022 Date of pronouncement 28.02.2022 ORDER PER SAKTIJIT DEY : JUDICIAL MEMBER This is an appeal by the Revenue against order dated

28.09.2017 of learned Commissioner of Income-Tax(Appeals)-40,

Delhi, pertaining to the assessment year 2014-15.

2.

At the outset, learned counsel for the assessee submitted

that the tax effect on the amount disputed by the Revenue in the

appeal is below the monetary limit of Rs.50,00,000. Thus, he

submitted that the appeal of the Revenue is not maintainable.

2 ITA No.7444 /Del/2017

3.

Learned Departmental Representative fairly accepted the

aforesaid factual position.

4.

We have considered rival submissions and perused the

material available on record. We find that the quantum of

dispute in the present appeal is an amount of Rs.40,45,109.

5.

Undisputedly, the tax effect on the quantum disputed works

out to Rs.13,74,933, which is much below the monetary limit of

Rs.50,00,000 fixed for filing of appeal before Income-Tax

Appellate Tribunal, in terms of Circular No. 17/2019 of CBDT

dated 8th August 2019.

6.

In view of the aforesaid, the present appeal of the Revenue is

deemed to have been withdrawn and accordingly dismissed.

7.

In the result, the appeal is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 28.02.2022.

Sd/- Sd/- (DR. BRR KUMAR) (SAKTIJIT DEY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER

Dated: 28th February, 2022. Mohan Lal Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi

3 ITA No.7444 /Del/2017

Sl. No. Particulars Date 1. Date of dictation: 28.02.2022 2. Date on which the draft of order is placed before the 28.02.2022 Dictating Member: 3. Date on which the draft of order is placed before the other Member: 4. Date on which the approved draft of order comes to the Sr. PS/PS: 5. Date of which the fair order is placed before the 28.02.2022 Dictating Member for pronouncement: 6. Date on which the final order received after having been singed/pronounced by the Members: 7. Date on which the final order is uploaded on the website of ITAT: 8. Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk 9. Date on which files goes to the Head Clerk: 10. Date on which file goes to the Assistant Registrar for signature on the order: 11. Date of dispatch of order: