NARESH BAJAJ,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-34(1), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal clarified the correct appeal number and allowed the assessee's request to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn, given their participation in the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee sought to withdraw their appeal before the ITAT, having opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme. There was a discrepancy in the appeal number mentioned in the scheme application and the actual appeal number.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme, and clarification of the correct appeal number.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “F”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI T.S. KAPOOR & SHRI N. K. CHOUDHRY
O R D E R PER N.K. CHOUDHRY, J. M.: The assessee has preferred the instant appeal against the order dated 28.12.2018 impugned herein, passed by the Id. Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals)-12, New Delhi (in short "Ld. Commissioner") u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act").
The Ld. Counsel for the Assessee vide letter dated 22-03-2022 has preferred the instant application under consideration for withdrawal of the appeal.
Our attention was drawn to the correspondence of the assessee with the Registry and the Revenue Department in respect of request for withdrawal of the appeal by opting Vivid Se Viswas scheme, the Assessee referred its appeal as and the Revenue Department allowed the application for Vivad Se Viswas Scheme and issued Form no. 5 by mentioning the same ITA no. i.e. 3554/Del/2019 whereas it is fact that the impugned order dated 28.12.2018 passed by the Id. Commissioner is the subject matter of DR as well.
On enquiry by us, it was stated by the Registry that initially appeal number allotted to the Assessee was however lateron it was rectified and new ITA no. i.e. 3561/Del/2019 was allotted to the appeal of the Assessee. We have considered the factual aspect and find that ITA no. 3554/Del/201 was allotted inadvertently and therefore deem it appropriate to clarify that for all purposes, the appeal of the Assessee be treated as ITA no. 3554/Del/2019.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026