TARUN BUILDWELL PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, DELHI
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’ NEW DLEHI
Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’ NEW DLEHI
BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No. 151/Del/2022 Assessment Year: 2018-19
Tarun Buildwell Pvt. Ltd., vs. DCIT, CPC, C-33, South Extension Part-2, Bengaluru. Delhi. PAN : AACCT2590H (Appellant) (Respondent)
Appellant by : None Respondent by: Sh. Om Prakash, Sr. DR
Date of hearing: 31.03.2022 Date of order : 31.03.2022
ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated
29.11.2021 of the learned CIT(A)-26, New Delhi relating to assessment year
2018-19.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of hearing.
Since the CIT(A) has also passed the ex parte order for want of prosecution,
therefore, I deem it appropriate to decide this appeal on the basis of
material available on record and after hearing the ld. DR.
The facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee filed its return of
income on 07.09.2018 declaring loss of Rs.2,18,124/-. In the intimation u/s.
143(1) of the Income-tax Act, income was computed at Rs.20,25,380/- after
making addition/adjustment of Rs.22,43,500/- on account of income
considered under the other heads of income and credit of losses of current
year to be set off amounting to Rs.14,82,825/- was also not given. Assessee
filed an appeal before the ld. CIT(A). However, due to non-appearance of
assessee despite number of opportunities granted, ld. CIT(A) dismissed the
appeal for want of prosecution. Aggrieved by such order of CIT(A), the
assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.
I have heard the ld. DR and perused the record. It is an admitted fact
that the ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee for want of
prosecution. However, he has not decided the appeal on merits as per
provisions of section 250(6), according to which the order of CIT(A) shall be
in writing and shall state the points for determination, the decision thereon
and the reason for the decision. However, ld. CIT(A) has not done so.
Therefore, considering the totality of facts of the case and in the interest of
justice, I deem it proper to restore the issue to the file of ld. CIT(A) with the
direction to grant one more final opportunity to the assessee to
substantiate its case and to decide the appeal on the basis of facts and law
by passing a speaking order. The assessee is also directed to cooperate
with the ld. CIT(A) in hearing of appeal without seeking unnecessary
adjournments on one pretext or the other, failing which the CIT(A) shall be
at liberty to pass an order as per law. The grounds raised by the assessee
are, accordingly, allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for
statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 31/03/2022. Sd/- (R.K. PANDA) Accountant Member Dated: 31/03/2022 ‘aks’
