FREDY CHRISPINO D'SOUZA,COLVA vs. ITO, WARD - 2, MARGAO
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had complied with the requirements of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, including filing necessary declarations and obtaining a certificate. Therefore, the Tribunal permitted the withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. The assessee later sought to withdraw the appeal as they had opted to settle the dispute under the Direct Tax – Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee who has opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BENCH, PANAJI
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI
आदेश/ORDER
PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 2, Panaji, dated 28.08.2018 for the assessment year 2014-15.
In this case, the assessee has moved application seeking withdrawal of the appeal filed by him on the ground that he has opted to settle the dispute involved in the said appeal under the Direct Tax – Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. It is also stated in the said application that required declarations in the prescribed Form No.1 and Form No.2 have been filed by the assessee and the Designated Authority has also issued certificate in Form No.3. The copies of which are enclosed herewith to the applications.
Shri Suresh Dhaka, the ld. DR has no objection in case the assessee wishes to withdraw the appeal.
As already noted, the assessee has duly filed the declarations in Form 1 and Form 2 and the Designated Authority has also issued the certificate in Form 3 as per section 5(1) of the Scheme determining the tax payable by the assessee under the Scheme. On receipt of the said certificate in Form 3, the assessee is now seeking to withdraw this appeal as required under the Scheme and keeping in view that the assessee has duly complied with the necessary requirements under the Scheme, we permit the withdrawal of this appeal filed by the assessee and dismiss the same as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 25th day of September, 2020.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026