SHRI ANIL SINGH,AJMER vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, AJMER

PDF · subscribers
ITA 877/JPR/2017Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur19 August 2019AY 2014-153 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the assessee did not receive a proper opportunity of hearing as notice was not served. Therefore, the ex parte order of the CIT(A) was set aside.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against an ex parte order passed by the CIT(A). The assessee contended that they did not receive proper notice for the hearing before the CIT(A).

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) passed an ex parte order without providing a proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES (SMC

Before: SHRI RAMESH C SHARMAvk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 877/JP/2017

For Appellant: Shri Devang Gargieya &, Shri Mahendra Gargieya (Advs) jktLo dh vksj ls@
Hearing: 06/08/2019Pronounced: 19/08/2019

ORDER PER: R.C. SHARMA, A.M. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the ex parte order of ld.CIT(A), Ajmer dated 17/08/2017 for the A.Y. 2014-15 in the matter of order passed U/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act).

2.

In this appeal, the assessee is basically aggrieved for the ex parte order passed by the ld. CIT(A) without giving due and proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

1.

2 ITA 877/JP/2017 Anil Singh Vs ITO 3. In support of the contention that the assessee was not in receipt of the notice for fixing the date of hearing on 17/08/2017, the assessee filed an affidavit. After going through the contents of the affidavit, I found that the assessee did not get proper opportunity of hearing in so far as notice was not served on the assessee, therefore, in the substantial interest of justice, I set aside the ex parte of the ld. CIT(A) and restore the matter back to the file of the ld. CIT(A) for deciding the matter afresh on merit after giving due and effective opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to appear before the ld. CIT(A) within two months from the date of receipt of this order. I direct accordingly.

4.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only.

Order pronounced in the open court on 19th August, 2019

Sd/- ¼jes'k lh 'kekZ½ (RAMESH C SHARMA) ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 19th August, 2019 *Ranjan

3 ITA 877/JP/2017 Anil Singh Vs ITO आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू vihykFkhZ@The Appellant- Shri Anil Singh, Ajmer. 1. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- The I.T.O., Ward-1(3), Ajmer. 2. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT 3. vk;dj vk;qDr¼vihy½@The CIT(A) 4. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 5. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No. 877/JP/2017) 6. vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,

सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →