INDO GERMAN INTERNATIONAL PVT.LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-10(1), DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the TPO's rectification order reduced the adjustment to NIL and the AO was yet to pass a consequential order. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as having become infructuous.
What were the facts?
The Assessee filed an appeal against the assessment order. During the pendency of the appeal, the TPO passed a rectification order under Section 154 reducing the adjustment to NIL.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal becomes infructuous after a subsequent rectification order reducing the adjustment to NIL, rendering the AO's consequential order pending.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
assessment order dated 28/10/2024 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C(13) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) pertaining to the Assessment Year 2021-22.
The Ld. Assessee's Representative submitted that during the pendency of the present Appeal, the Ld. TPO passed a rectification order dated 24/12/2024 under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act 1961, wherein reduced the adjustmentto NIL. Further submitted that pursuant to the order of the TPO dated 24/12/2024, the A.O. is yet to pass consequential giving effect order. The Ld. Assessee's Representative has also placed the order passed u/s 154 of the Act dated 24/12/2024 on record and sought for passing appropriate order.
The Ld.Departmental Representative has not disputed the above averments made by the Ld. Assessee's Representative.
Considering the fact that the Ld. TPO has passed a rectification order under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act 1961, which resulted in reduction of the adjustment to NIL and pursuant to the order of the TPO dated 24/12/2024, the A.O. is yet to pass consequential giving effect order, we dismiss the captioned appeal having become in-fructuous with a liberty to the Assessee to revive the Appeal, if so required/advised.
In the result, the Appeal of the Assessee is dismissed for having become in-fructuous.
Order pronounced in the open court on 13th June , 2025
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026