AAC INDIA PVT. LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD-1(1), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal confirmed the addition based on the 8% estimated profit but directed the deletion of Rs. 91,480/- which was an addition to the returned income already covered by the estimated profit.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed an addition of Rs. 2,37,048/- made by the CIT(A) based on an estimated gross profit of 8% of turnover. The assessee argued that it had provided a complete Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss account.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in upholding the addition of Rs. 2,37,048/- by applying a gross profit of 8% on turnover, and whether the returned income should be added on top of the estimated profit.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’ NEW DLEHI
Before: SHRI C.M. GARG
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 14.02.2019 passed by ld. CIT(A)-32, New Delhi for the assessment year 2010-11 on the following grounds : “1. That, on facts and circumstances of the case the Ld.CIT(A) has erred in making an addition of Rs. 2,37,048/-.
2. That, the learned CIT(A) in upholding the addition has erred in ignoring the fact that, the assessee has filed complete Balance Sheet together with Profit & Loss account thereby providing details of expenses incurred.
3. That, on facts and circumstances of the case the learned CIT(A) has erred in upholding the order of the assessing officer and applying gross profit@8% of the turnover and thus upholding addition of Rs. 2,37,048/-.
4. That, the order was passed by the Ld. CIT(A) without giving proper opportunity of being heard.” 2. The Assessing Officer was right in estimating profit @ 8% of the turnover, hence, action of the Assessing Officer and first appellate order is confirmed. However, I also observe that the Assessing Officer has made addition to the returned income of assessee Rs.91,480/- and addition of net profit has been added to this amount. When the Assessing Officer is estimating profit @ 8%, the returned income from the same business cannot be added over and above the estimated net profit @ 8%. Therefore, Rs.91,480/- is directed to be deleted in the taxable income of the assessee.
In the result, the appeal is partly allowed.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Basant Kumar Gupta vs. Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S Swapnashiyana Homes Developers Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026