ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-02, NEW DELHI vs. ABHINAV STEELS & POWER LTD., NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3391/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 May 2022AY 2015-163 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that in light of the NCLT's moratorium order, which has overriding effect, the pending appeal cannot be adjudicated. Similar decisions by coordinate benches were also noted.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2015-16. The assessee brought to the Tribunal's notice an NCLT order declaring a moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

What were the issues?

Whether a pending appeal before the ITAT can continue in light of a moratorium declared by the NCLT under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 14,Section 7

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “A” NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA & SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY

For Appellant: Shri Aman Garg, CA
Hearing: 05.05.2022

आदेश/O R D E R

PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, AM:

1.

The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-32, New Delhi (‘CIT(A)’ in short), dated 21.01.2019 concerning AY 2015-16.

2.

When the matter was called for hearing, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee in Revenue’s appeal pointed out that the National Company Law Tribunal (‘NCLT’ in short) at New Delhi in Company Petition No.(IB)- 275(ND)/2019 has passed an order dated 31.07.2019 under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee adverted para 49 of the aforesaid order delivered by NCLT whereby moratorium in terms of Section 14 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 has been declared which interalia prohibits continuation of pending proceedings against the assessee including execution of any judgment, decree or in any court of law, Tribunal, arbitration panel or other authority. It was thus submitted that in view of the order of NCLT bearing overriding effect in terms of Insolvency and Bankruptcy code 2016, the Tribunal is prevented by law to continue with the pending appeal.

3.

The Ld. DR for the revenue did not offer any comments on the aforesaid position convassed on behalf of the assessee.

4.

The co-ordinate Bench of Tribunal in Dy. CIT Vs. Global Softech Ltd. order dated 16.03.2022 has, in similar fact situation, held that in the light of resolution plan, which is binding on the Tribunal, such pending appeals cannot proceed for adjudication.

5.

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 05/05/2022

More judgments on Section 14

All 685 judgments and leading authorities on Section 14 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →