ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-02, NEW DELHI vs. ABHINAV STEELS & POWER LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that in light of the NCLT's moratorium order, which has overriding effect, the pending appeal cannot be adjudicated. Similar decisions by coordinate benches were also noted.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2015-16. The assessee brought to the Tribunal's notice an NCLT order declaring a moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
What were the issues?
Whether a pending appeal before the ITAT can continue in light of a moratorium declared by the NCLT under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “A” NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA & SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY
आदेश/O R D E R
PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, AM:
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-32, New Delhi (‘CIT(A)’ in short), dated 21.01.2019 concerning AY 2015-16.
When the matter was called for hearing, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee in Revenue’s appeal pointed out that the National Company Law Tribunal (‘NCLT’ in short) at New Delhi in Company Petition No.(IB)- 275(ND)/2019 has passed an order dated 31.07.2019 under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee adverted para 49 of the aforesaid order delivered by NCLT whereby moratorium in terms of Section 14 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 has been declared which interalia prohibits continuation of pending proceedings against the assessee including execution of any judgment, decree or in any court of law, Tribunal, arbitration panel or other authority. It was thus submitted that in view of the order of NCLT bearing overriding effect in terms of Insolvency and Bankruptcy code 2016, the Tribunal is prevented by law to continue with the pending appeal.
The Ld. DR for the revenue did not offer any comments on the aforesaid position convassed on behalf of the assessee.
The co-ordinate Bench of Tribunal in Dy. CIT Vs. Global Softech Ltd. order dated 16.03.2022 has, in similar fact situation, held that in the light of resolution plan, which is binding on the Tribunal, such pending appeals cannot proceed for adjudication.
In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 05/05/2022
More judgments on Section 14
- Infra Developers, Shivpuri vs Income Tax Officer, AshoknagarITA 454/AGR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shri Jayantibhai Virjibhai Babariya, SuratWTA 2/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shri Jayantibhai Virjibhai Babariya, SuratWTA 1/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Narayan Industries Global Limited, New Delhi vs DCIT Circle 16(1), DelhiITA 8422/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Manpreet Estates LLP, Mumbai vs ACIT, Central Circle 8(3), MumbaiITA 4386/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026