SMS COUNTRY NETWORKS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3), HYDERABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The withdrawal was permitted because the issues involved in the appeal had been settled in the scrutiny assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2014-15. At the time of hearing, the assessee sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be allowed to withdraw its appeal when the underlying issues have been resolved in a subsequent assessment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCH “B”, HYDERABAD
Before: SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI & SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH “B”, HYDERABAD BEFORE SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/s. SMS Country Vs. Income Tax Officer, Networks (P) Ltd., Ward-3(3), Hyderabad – 084 7th Floor, Signature PAN: AAJCS 0349 E Towers, Kondapur, Hyderabad – 500 084. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: None Revenue by: Sri Y.V.S.T. Sai, CIT-DR Date of hearing: 20/01/2020 Date of pronouncement: 20/01/2020 ORDER PER A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, AM.:
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Hyderabad in F.No.Pr.CIT- 3/Hyd/263/2018-19, dated 08/03/2019 passed U/s. 263 of the Act the Act the for the A.Y. 2014-15.
At the time of hearing the appeal none appeared on behalf of the assessee, however we observed from the records that the assessee had filed a letter on 08/01/2020 seeking permission of the Bench to withdraw its appeal because the issues involved in the appeal were settled in the scrutiny assessment. The Ld. DR did not express any objection for the same. Therefore, considering the assessee’s request, the appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed to be withdrawn.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Pronounced in the open Court on 20th January, 2020.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Society For Human Resource Management Shrm vs. Strategic Hrm & Ors.Delhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Sanjay Kumar Jain & Anr. vs. Nandi Ayurved & Ors.Delhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Beiersdorf Ag & Anr. vs. Duvac Cosmedics & Ors.Delhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Namastu Enterprise Private Limited vs. Kajalben Maheshbhai Kaklotar (Proprietor Of Khodal Enterprise) And AnrDelhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Haveli Restaurant And Resorts LTD vs. Shubham Food EnterprisesDelhi · 3 Nov 2026