SMT. MADHU GOYAL,FATEHGARH SAHIB vs. DCIT, CC, PATIALA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal allowed the assessee's application for withdrawal of the appeal. This was based on the assessee availing the immunity scheme under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act and the issuance of a certificate by the Principal CIT.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A). Subsequently, the assessee applied for withdrawal of the appeal as they had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn if the assessee has opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and obtained a certificate.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
PER N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-5, Ludhiana dt. 22/03/2019.
The Assessee furnished an application for withdrawal of this appeal stating therein as under:
Sub- Regarding withdrawal of Appeal in the case of the Madhu Goyal PAN NO.AAUPG1470C A.Y. 2013-14ITA No. 672/CHADI/2019 In regard to above appeal, it is submitted that in response to my application under the The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act. 2020, the Principal CIT, (Central) Ludhiana have issued a certificate under sub section 1 (1) of section 5 of the said act in form no. 3 numbering 339858900220520 dt. 22.05.2020 Therefore I want to withdraw my above said appeal and which may please be allowed. It is therefore requested that this may be treated as withdrawal of my appeal, banking you, Yours faithfully Sd/- (Madhu Goyal)
During the coruse of hearing the Ld. Counsel for the Assessee submitted that since the assessee has availed the immunity scheme i.e; Vivad Se Vishwas and the Ld. Principal CIT (Central) Ludhiana have issued certificate dt. 22/05/2020 in Form No. 3, in response to the application filed by the assessee, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020.
The Ld. Sr. DR did not object if appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
(Order pronounced in the open Court on 28/05/2020 )
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026