LEADING ESTATE LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-15(1), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1189/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 June 2022AY 2014-153 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and that the Designated Authority had issued Form-5. Consequently, the appeal was treated as withdrawn and dismissed as infructuous.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order confirming the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c). During the appellate proceedings, the assessee opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal has become infructuous due to the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 271(1)(c)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’: NEW DELHI

ORDER PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, AM: (A) This appeal by Assessee is filed against the order of Learned

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, New Delhi [Ld. CIT(A)”, for short], dated 16.01.2019 for Assessment Year 2014-15.

Grounds taken in this appeal of Assessee are as under:

“1. That on facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the learned CIT(Appeals) erred in confirming the action of the AO levying penalty under section 271(1) (c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and holding the assessee guilty of filing inaccurate particulars of income and concealment of income.

M/s Leading Estates Ltd. vs. ACIT The above action being most arbitrary, erroneous and unlawful, it is prayed that the same be quashed.”

(B) In the course of appellate proceedings in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT”, for short) the Learned Authorized Representative (“Ld. AR”, for short) for the assessee submitted a letter informing that the assessee has opted for Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (“VSVS”, for short) and that the Designated Authority has already issued Form-5 under VSVS. A copy of Form-5 issued by the Designated Authority was also enclosed with the aforesaid letter. At the time of hearing, the Ld. AR submitted that the appeal has become infructuous in view of the assessee opting for VSVS; and that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. Learned Senior Departmental Representative was in agreement with this.

After due consideration and in view of the foregoing, we are of the opinion that this appeal has become infructuous on account of aforesaid VSVS, and that this appeal may be treated as withdrawn on account of the aforesaid VSVS. Accordingly, this appeal having become infructuous, is treated as withdrawn and is hereby dismissed.

M/s Leading Estates Ltd. vs. ACIT (B.1) Before we part, we hereby clarify, by way of abundant caution, that if for some reason the disputes under this appeal before us are not settled under the aforesaid VSVS, then the assessee will be at liberty to approach ITAT for restoration of this appeal in accordance with law.

(C) In the result, this appeal is dismissed.

This order was already pronounced orally on 16th June, 2022 in Open Court, in the presence of representatives of both sides, after conclusion of the hearing. Now this order in writing is signed today on 16.06.2022.

More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)

All 25,141 judgments and leading authorities on Section 271(1)(c) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →