RAVINDER KUMAR SHARMA,PANIPAT vs. ITO WARD - 5, PANIPAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(Appeals) failed to adjudicate the ground challenging the reopening of assessment. Therefore, the appeal was restored to the CIT(Appeals) for fresh adjudication of this ground and also the grounds on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(Appeals) challenging the reopening of assessment under Section 148. However, the CIT(Appeals) did not adjudicate this ground and proceeded to decide the appeal on merits.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Appeals) properly adjudicated the grounds challenging the reopening of assessment. The validity of the reopening of assessment itself was a key issue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, [ DELHI BENCH “S.M.C.” NEW DELHI ]
Before: SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD, S.M.C.
आदेश /O R D E R
PER C. N. PRASAD, J.M. :
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Karnal [hereinafter referred to CIT (Appeals)] dated 22.07.2019 for assessment year 2011-12.
At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that the ground raised by the assessee on reopening of assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) was not disposed of by the ld. CIT (Appeals). Inviting my attention to ground No. 1 of grounds of appeal filed before the ld. CIT (Appeals) and also the written submissions, which were extracted by the ld. CIT (Appeals) on page 2 para 3.1, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that the grounds raised by the assessee challenging the reopening of assessment were not disposed of by the ld. CIT (Appeals) and where as the appeal was adjudicated on merits of the additions made in the reassessment order. Therefore, on a query as to whether this appeal can be sent back to the ld. CIT (Appeals) the ld. Counsel for the assessee has no objection in sending back this appeal to the file of the ld. CIT (Appeals) for adjudicating the ground raised by the assessee on reopening of assessment.
The ld. DR also expressed no serious objection in sending back the appeal to the ld. CIT (Appeals) to adjudicate the ground taken on validity of reopening of assessment.
On hearing both the sides and on pursuing the orders of the authorities below, I find that the ld. CIT (Appeals) did not adjudicate the ground challenging reopening of assessment by the assessee. In the circumstances it is deemed fit to restore this appeal to the file of the ld. CIT (Appeals) to dispose of the ground challenging the reopening of assessment. Since the decision of reopening of assessment has bearing on merits of the case, the grounds taken by the assessee on merits are also restored to the file of the ld. CIT (Appeals) who shall decide afresh in accordance with law, after providing adequate opportunity of being heard.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on : 22/04/2022.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vandemataram Projects Private Limited vs. Raipur Development AuthorityChhattisgarh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026
- Mrs. Aqsa Begum vs. Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026