SMITA RATHI,DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-14, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
Following precedents set by coordinate Benches on similar consolidated approvals for the Nagpal group, the Tribunal found the approval under Section 153D to be deficient as it did not reflect the examination of individual assessment records. Consequently, the ground raised by the assessee was allowed, and the impugned assessment was quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against an order passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 153A, arguing a deficiency in approval under Section 153D. The approval, granted by the competent authority, was for consolidated assessments covering multiple assessees and assessment years within the Nagpal group, allegedly without proper application of mind or examination of individual assessment records.
What were the issues?
Whether a consolidated approval under Section 153D, issued for various assessees and assessment years in a search assessment without reflecting the examination of individual assessment records, is valid in law.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES: G : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
Assessment Year: 2018-19 Smita Rathi, Vs ACIT, A-184, Shivalik FF, Central Circle-14, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi. New Delhi – 110 017. PAN: ACSPR9900Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Akash Ojha, Advocate & Shri Mayank Patawari, Advocate Revenue by : Shri Mahesh Kumar, CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 03.06.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 13.06.2025 ORDER
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
This appeal is preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 30.06.2023 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Delhi-31 (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. First Appellate Authority or ‘the Ld. FAA’, for short) in Appeals No.684/20-21 arising out of the appeal before it against the orders dated 31.12.2019 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’) by the ACIT, Central Circle-14, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. AO).
Heard and perused the record. The ground before this Bench arises out of the alleged deficiency in approval by non-application of mind while granting approval u/s 153D of the Act. Admittedly, the draft assessment order was forwarded to the competent authority by letter dated 30.12.2019 mentioning that it is part of the Nagpal group of cases. Similarly, by another letter dated 30.12.2019 in case of 28 assessees covered under search on Nagpal group for various assessment years, the approval u/s 153D of the Act was sought. Of them, in cases of Anu Nagpal order dated 16.04.2025, Prateek Nagpal vs. ACIT decided vide M/s ShivVani Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. ITA No.5040/Del/2024 and Shri Hari Kishan Rathi ITA 2566/DEL/2022 order dated 8.4.2025, the coordinate Benches have taken into consideration the same set of approval and held that on such consolidated approval for various assessment years in regard to various assessees, without reflecting in the approval that assessment records were examined in regard to the each assessee, the approvals were granted and the approval were not found to be in accordance with the law and the assessments have been quashed. The case of the assessee is no different. Accordingly, the ground is allowed. The appeal is allowed and the impugned assessment is quashed. Order pronounced in the open court on 13.06.2025. Sd/- Sd/- (MANISH AGARWAL) (ANUBHAV SHARMA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 13th June, 2025. dk
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026