PATEL SEVA SINGH,BOKARO STEEL CITY vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal reversed the CIT(Exemption)'s decision, holding that the benefit to a specific community is not a ground to deny registration, and only the objects, not the activities, are to be examined for Section 12AA registration.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal arose from the CIT(Exemption)'s order denying registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) based this denial on two grounds: the trust was set up for a specific community, and its activities were not genuine.
What were the issues?
Whether a trust established for the benefit of a specific community can be denied registration under Section 12AA, and whether the genuineness of activities or the objects of the trust should be examined for such registration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT, Rajkot-II v. Leuva Patel Seva Samaj Trust8 citing42 Taxmann.com 181 · 2014 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini
आदेश /O R D E R PER BENCH (oral):- This assessee’s appeal arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)-Patna’s order dated 13.03.2019, denying registration in proceedings u/s. 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short ‘the Act’ Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
Case file suggests that the CIT(Exemption) has declined the assessee’s sec. 12AA registration filed on 05.11.2018 by his twin folded reasoning this trust has been set up to provide benefits to only Patel “Community” and its activities are not genuine; respectively. We do not any merit in either of these findings. Hon’ble Gujarat high court in (2014) 42 taxmann.com 181 (Guj) Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajkot-II vs. Leuva Patel Seva Samaj Trust holds that the former question of a trust set up for providing benefits to a Patel Seva Sangha Vs. CIT(Ex), Patna Page 2 particular community does not avail ground to deny sec. 12AA registration since the issue arises during the course of exemption proceedings u/s 11 only.
Coming to latter aspect of the non-genuine of activities, we take note of hon’ble apex court’s judgment in M/s Ananda Social & Educational Trust vs. CIT in Civil Appeal Nos. 5437-5438 of 2012 dated 19.02.2020 that only an assessee’s objects have be examined at the time of granting sec.12AA registration and not activities. We thus reverse the CIT(Exemption)’s twin reasoning and hold the assessee as entitled for the impugned sec. 12AAA registration.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026