SHRI PRADEEP SHARMA,BEAWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, BEAWAR
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee failed to explain the cause of delay in filing the appeal. Therefore, the appeal was not maintainable as it was barred by limitation.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal with a delay of 33 days. The assessee claimed the delay occurred because the appeal was wrongly filed in ITAT Jodhpur. However, no documentary evidence or affidavit was provided to support this claim.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal can be condoned without proper supporting evidence. Whether an appeal filed beyond the prescribed limitation period is maintainable.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCH ’SMC’, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI SHRI VIJAY PAL RAOvk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 1421/JP/2018
PER VIJAY PAL RAO, JM :
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 06.08.2018 of ld. CIT (Appeals), Ajmer for the assessment year 2015-16. None has appeared on behalf of the assessee despite the notice was issued through RPAD. It transpires from the record that since beginning nobody has appeared on behalf of the assessee and the hearing of the appeal was adjourned due to non appearance and in one of the occasions on the application of the assessee. Thus in the facts and circumstances when the assessee is not appearing, the appeal of the assessee is taken up for hearing and adjudication ex parte.
There is a delay of 33 days in filing the present appeal. The assessee has filed a letter for condonation of delay in response to the defect pointed out by the Registry. The assessee has explained the delay in filing the appeal as it was wrongly filed in ITAT Jodhpur. However, in support of that explanation neither any documentary evidence is filed nor any affidavit is filed by the assessee. Accordingly in the facts and circumstances when the assessee has failed to explain the cause of delay of 33 days in filing the present appeal, the same is not maintainable being barred by limitation. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed being barred by limitation.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order is pronounced in the open court on 29/10/2019.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026