M/S NCG ENTERPRISES LTD.,LUDHIANA vs. JCIT, LUDHIANA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee intended to withdraw the appeals due to opting for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme'. The revenue had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee had filed appeals before the ITAT. The assessee subsequently opted for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme'. The assessee then intended to withdraw the present appeals.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals after opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आदेश/Order
PER ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The present appeals have been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 15.03.2017 and 22.02.2019 respectively of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Ludhiana.
ITA -456/CHD/2017 & 547/CHD/2019 A.Y. 2011-12 Page 2 of 2
At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted 2. that since the assessee has opted for 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme' and, therefore, he intends to withdraw the present appeals. A separate application dated 27.07.2020 for withdrawal of the appeals has been submitted by the ld. Counsel for the assessee. The ld. DR has no objection for the said withdrawal.
In view of the above, the appeals of the assessees are hereby dismissed as 'Withdrawn'
Order pronounced on 29.07.2020.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026