SMT. CHANDRAKANTA JAIN,INDORE vs. THE I T O WARD- 1(4), INDORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal decided that the appeals were directed against the orders of the CIT(A) concerning the determination of capital gains on the sale of immovable property. The core issue revolved around the consideration shown in the sale deed versus the assessed value.
What were the facts?
The assessees sold an immovable property at Talawali Chanda, Indore. The Assessing Officer received information through the Annual Information Report (AIR) regarding the sale of this property.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the correct determination of capital gains arising from the sale of an immovable property, specifically concerning the consideration shown in the sale deed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI MANISH BORAD
सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 08/11/2021 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date of Pronouncement: 15 /11/2021 आदेश/O R D E R
PER RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT :
The present two appeals are directed at the instance of two assessees against the separate orders of the learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-I, Indore passed on 25th February, 2019 in the case of Smt. & 663/Ind/2019 Assessees : Smt Chandrakanta Jain & Kalpana Jain AY : 2010-11 2 Kalpana Jain and 20th February, 2019 in the case of Smt. Chandrakanta Jain, both for Assessment Year 2010-11.
The short question involved in both the appeals relates to determination of capital gain, if any, arisen to both the assessees on sale of immovable property at Talawali Chanda, Indore.
With the assistance of learned representatives, we have gone through the record carefully. It emerges out from the record that the Assessing Officer got information through AIR, i.e. Annual Information Report, exhibiting the fact that 21 persons had sold an immovable property at Talawali Chanda, Indore. He, therefore, issued notice under Section 148 of the Act in the case of Smt. Kalpana Jain. According to the Assessing Officer, the consideration has been shown at Rs.30,00,000/- in the sale deed registered on 21.10.2009, whereas the property was assessed by the Sub-
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026