MANKAMAESHWAR STEELS PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. PR. CIT, ALIGARH
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that no additions were made in the fresh assessment order passed pursuant to the Section 263 direction. Therefore, the appeal was considered infructuous.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which set aside the original assessment order. The original assessment was to be re-examined on issues of share application money, commodity business income, and Section 115BBE. Subsequently, no additions were made in the fresh assessment order.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of the Section 263 order and its impact on the subsequent assessment. The appeal became infructuous as no adverse findings were made in the re-assessment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
Before: DR. B.R.R.KUMAR & SH.ANUBHAV SHARMA
Heard. The appeal was filed against order dated 14.03.2019 u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 passed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Aligarh whereby the assessment order passed by ACIT, Circle 4(1), Aligarh u/s 143(3) dated 06.03.2017 was set aside with direction to pass afresh order after examining the issue of share application money amounting to Rs. 27,50,000/-, income from commodity business amounting to Rs. 6,65,75,000/- and also the application of Section 115BBE.
The appeal was filed with the application of condonation of delay of six days and considering the reasons cited and little delay, the same is allowed.
It was submitted on behalf of assessee by the counsel that in the fresh order passed no addition has been made u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026