DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-31, NEW DELHI vs. MALANA POWER COMPANY LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that no disallowance under Section 14A was warranted as there was no exempt income. It also confirmed that carbon credits are capital receipts, as decided by a coordinate bench.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order concerning disallowance under Section 14A and the treatment of carbon credits. The assessee had not earned any exempt income during the year.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 14A is applicable when no exempt income is earned, and whether carbon credits constitute revenue or capital receipts.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’, NEW DELHI
Before: Dr. B. R. R. KumarSh. Anubhav Sharma
Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member:
The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order of ld. CIT(A)-37, New Delhi dated 28.02.2019.
Disallowance u/s 14A:
During the year, the assessee has not earned any exempt income, hence we hold that no disallowance is called for.
Carbon Credits:
The issue of treatment of the Carbon Credits as revenue receipt of capital receipt stands adjudicated by the order of the Co-ordinate bench of the Tribunal in assessee’s own case in vide order dated 27.04.2018 wherein it was held that the Carbon Credits are to be considered as capital receipts. Vide the amendment brought with effect from 01.04.2018, the Government of India has allowed a concessionary tax rate of ten per cent for taxpayers who are earning an income by transfer of carbon credits is not applicable to the assessment year before us.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 04/05/2022.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026