ANKIT SADANA,DELHI vs. PR. CIT -24, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The dispute was considered settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, rendering the appeal infructuous.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT challenging an order passed under Section 263. The assessee subsequently sought to withdraw the appeal as the dispute was settled under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn as the underlying dispute has been settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘A’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU, HON’BLE & SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY
In the present appeal, the assessee has challenged the order passed under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -24, New Delhi, for the assessment year 2014-15.
When the appeal was called for hearing none appeared on behalf of the assessee, however, the assessee has furnished letter dated 19.05.2022 seeking permission to withdraw the present appeal, since the dispute arising in the appeal has been settled under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
Learned Departmental Representative did not oppose assessee’s request for withdrawal of the appeal.
We have heard learned Departmental Representative and perused the materials on record. It is observed, the assessee had opted for settling the dispute arising in the present appeal under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. Accepting assessee’s declaration, the designated authority has issued Form 5 on 10.06.2021. Thus, for all practical purposes, the dispute arising in the present appeal has been settled.
In view of the aforesaid, we accept assessee’s request for withdrawal of the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 20th May, 2022
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026