MANISH PERIWAL,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the quantum additions, which formed the basis for the penalty, had been deleted by a previous Tribunal order. Consequently, the penalty order could not survive.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against a penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) for AY 2006-07. The penalty was based on additions made during assessment proceedings under Section 143(3) read with Section 153A.
What were the issues?
Whether a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) can be sustained when the underlying additions have been deleted by the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, [ DELHI BENCH “E” NEW DELHI ]
Before: SHRI G. S. PANNUSHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD
आदेश / O R D E R PER C. N. PRASAD, J. M. :
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-23 [hereinafter referred to as CIT (Appeals)] New Delhi, dated 14.12.2017 in sustaining the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for assessment year 2006-07.
The ld. Counsel for the assessee, at the outset, submits that the quantum addition / disallowance made while completing the assessment under Section 143(3) read with Section 153A of the Act has been deleted by the Tribunal in dated 18.05.2022. Copy of the order is placed on record. The ld. Counsel for the assessee, therefore, submits that since the quantum addition / disallowance made while completing the assessment has been deleted by the Tribunal, the penalty order passed by the Assessing Officer cannot survive.
We have perused the order of the Tribunal in dated 18.05.2022 for the assessment year 2006-07 and find that the Tribunal held that no addition is called for in the absence of any incriminating material found and seized during the course of search and seizure action. Since the Tribunal deleted the addition made in the assessment order passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 153A of the Act which was the basis for imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act the penalty order will not survive. Accordingly, the penalty order passed by the Assessing Officer imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act for the assessment year 2006-07 is set aside and the penalty is deleted.
In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on : 07/06/2022.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026