MANISH PERIWAL,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1089/DEL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 June 2022AY 2006-073 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the quantum additions, which formed the basis for the penalty, had been deleted by a previous Tribunal order. Consequently, the penalty order could not survive.

What were the facts?

The assessee appealed against a penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) for AY 2006-07. The penalty was based on additions made during assessment proceedings under Section 143(3) read with Section 153A.

What were the issues?

Whether a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) can be sustained when the underlying additions have been deleted by the Tribunal.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 271(1)(c),Section 143(3),Section 153A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, [ DELHI BENCH “E” NEW DELHI ]

Before: SHRI G. S. PANNUSHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD

For Appellant: Shri Shashi Bhushan Shukla
Hearing: 07/06/2022

आदेश / O R D E R PER C. N. PRASAD, J. M. :

1.

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-23 [hereinafter referred to as CIT (Appeals)] New Delhi, dated 14.12.2017 in sustaining the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for assessment year 2006-07.

2.

The ld. Counsel for the assessee, at the outset, submits that the quantum addition / disallowance made while completing the assessment under Section 143(3) read with Section 153A of the Act has been deleted by the Tribunal in dated 18.05.2022. Copy of the order is placed on record. The ld. Counsel for the assessee, therefore, submits that since the quantum addition / disallowance made while completing the assessment has been deleted by the Tribunal, the penalty order passed by the Assessing Officer cannot survive.

3.

We have perused the order of the Tribunal in dated 18.05.2022 for the assessment year 2006-07 and find that the Tribunal held that no addition is called for in the absence of any incriminating material found and seized during the course of search and seizure action. Since the Tribunal deleted the addition made in the assessment order passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 153A of the Act which was the basis for imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act the penalty order will not survive. Accordingly, the penalty order passed by the Assessing Officer imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act for the assessment year 2006-07 is set aside and the penalty is deleted.

5.

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on : 07/06/2022.

More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)

All 25,141 judgments and leading authorities on Section 271(1)(c) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →