No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH
PER RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT:
The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the learned CIT(A)-13, Ahmedabad dated 28th June 2018 passed for Assessment Year 2009-10.
We have heard the Learned Representatives of both the parties through video conferencing. Learned Counsel for the Assessee, at the outset, submitted that assessee has opted to avail the benefits of “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020” and has also placed on record the copy of Form No.3 before the Tribunal in this regard. An application dated 11.12.2020 requesting for withdrawal of appeal under the said scheme is also placed on record.
The learned Departmental Representative, on the other hand, submitted that he has no objection to the withdrawal of appeal in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee. 2018 Ojash Jaysukhlal Dave Vs DCIT AY 2009-10 - 2 -
We have considered the submission and application of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal under the scheme “Vivad se Vishwas”. In the light of aforesaid request made by the assessee, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of Vivad se Vishwas Scheme for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for hearing before ITAT in accordance with law.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the Court on 16th December 2020 at Ahmedabad.