PAVAN KUMAR JAIN,NEW DELHI vs. PR. CIT - 12, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal considered the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. Based on the assessee's instructions, the Tribunal permitted the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT challenging an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263. During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee expressed an intention to withdraw it.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee's appeal should be permitted to be withdrawn.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘F’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU, HON’BLE & SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY
the order dated 22.04.2020 passed by learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) -12, Delhi, under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) for the assessment year 2015-16.
The instant appeal was heard on 22nd March, 2022. Post conclusion of hearing, the assessee vide letter dated 30th April, 2022, expressed his intention to withdraw the appeal and sought permission of the Bench to do so. The contents of the aforesaid letter of the assessee are as under:
Considering the aforesaid request of the assessee, the appeal was re-fixed for hearing on 13.05.2022. When the appeal was called for hearing, learned Authorized Representative of the assessee, on instructions, sought withdrawal of the appeal.
In view of the aforesaid, we permit the assessee to withdraw the present appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 13th May, 2022
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026