K.V.FINLEASE PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. PR. CIT., NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal after noting that the dispute had been settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The designated authority had issued Form 5, indicating settlement.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed under section 263 of the Income-tax Act. The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal as they had opted to settle the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘C’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA
ORDER PER SAKTIJIT DEY, JM:
This is an appeal by the assessee against order dated 10.07.2018 of learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT)-5, Delhi, passed under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) for the assessment year 2008-09.
Learned Authorized Representative of the assessee, on instruction, sought permission to withdraw the present appeal as the assessee has opted to settle the dispute arising in the appeal under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. In fact, letter dated 28.05.2022 of the assessee, enclosing declaration filed under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and Form 5 issued by the designated authority have been furnished before the Bench.
Learned Departmental Representative has no objection to the withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee.
Having considered the submissions of the parties, we find that accepting assessee’s declaration under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, the designated authority has issued Form 5 on 27th December, 2021. Thus, for all practical purposes, the dispute arising in the appeal stands settled. That being the factual position emerging on record, we permit the assessee to withdraw the present appeal. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 30th May, 2022
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Pawan Kumar Rajgaria vs. State Of West BengalCalcutta · 4 Nov 2026
- Mohammed Fazil vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 4 Nov 2026
- Tvl. Devaerakkam Mercy Mary vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 4 Nov 2026
- Procter And Gamble Health LTD vs. Union Of INDIATelangana · 4 Nov 2026
- M/S Ritika Ispat PVT. Limited, Balanda, Sundargarh vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 4 Nov 2026