DCIT CIRCLE-18(1), NEW DELHI vs. NEMINATH INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty, stating that since the quantum addition was deleted, the penalty order, which was based on that addition, would not survive. The Revenue's appeal against the quantum addition to the High Court was noted as pending.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for AY 2010-11. The penalty was levied on an addition that was subsequently deleted by the Tribunal.
What were the issues?
Whether penalty under Section 271(1)(c) can be sustained when the underlying addition has been deleted. The impact of a pending appeal on the quantum addition on the penalty order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, [ DELHI BENCH “E” NEW DELHI ]
Before: SHRI G. S. PANNUSHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD
आदेश / O R D E R PER C. N. PRASAD, J. M. :
This appeal filed by the Revenue is against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-36 [hereinafter referred to as CIT (Appeals)] New Delhi, dated 17.01.2019 in deleting penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for assessment year 2010-11. 1
In spite of issue of notice none appeared on behalf of the assessee. This appeal is disposed of on hearing the ld. DR.
We have perused the order of the ld. CIT (Appeals) and noticed that penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act was deleted by the ld. CIT (Appeals) since the Tribunal deleted the quantum addition of Rs.3,95,00,000/- in respect of advances written off by the assessee. Since the Tribunal deleted the addition made in the assessment order passed under Section 143(3) of the Act which was the foundation for imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act, the penalty order will not survive. We further observed from the grounds of appeal of the Revenue that Tribunal order in quantum proceedings has been challenged by the Revenue before the Hon’ble High Court and the same is still pending. The ld. DR could not bring to our notice further developments in this matter. In the circumstances the penalty order passed by the Assessing Officer imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act for the assessment year 2006-07 is set aside and the penalty is deleted.
In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on : 10/06/2022.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026