DCIT, CIRCLE- 3(2), NEW DELHI vs. AT & T COMMUNICATION SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that the appeal of the Revenue was liable to be dismissed on two grounds: low tax effect and a favorable judicial precedent regarding delayed payment of employees' contribution to PF/ESIC.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against an order concerning the assessment year 2012-13. The assessee argued that the appeal should be dismissed due to low tax effect as per CBDT guidelines.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed on grounds of low tax effect and if delayed payment of employees' PF/ESIC contribution, made before the due date of filing the return, is allowable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “A” DELHI
Before: SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA
PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, A.M.: The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, New Delhi (‘CIT(A)’ in short) dated 13.09.2019 arising from the assessment order dated 20.03.2018 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 154 r.w. Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) concerning AY 2012-13. 2. When the matter was called for hearing, the ld. counsel for the assessee at the outset submitted that the appeal of the Revenue is liable to be dismissed on account of low tax in terms of guidelines issued by CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019. 3. In the alternative, it was submitted that the issue in question relates to delayed payment of employees’ contribution to PF/ESIC. It was submitted that employees’ contribution to PF and ESIC has been made prior to due date of filing of return under Section 139(1) and thus in the light of decision of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Pr.CIT vs. Pro Interactive Service (India) Pvt. Ltd. vide order dated 10.09.2018 in the issue is squarely covered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
The appeal of the Revenue is liable to be dismissed on both grounds. Firstly, on account of tax effect as per CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 as well as in the light of the judicial precedent in the case of Pr.CIT vs. Pro Interactive Service (India) Pvt. Ltd. vide order dated 10.09.2018 in ITA No.983/2018. We thus see no merit in the appeal of the Revenue.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 27/06/2022.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Abd Maestro Private Limited vs. Great Galleon Ventures LTDDelhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Jangeer Singh Trading As Jangeer Singh Kabulshah Agriculture Works vs. Yogesh Jangid Trading As Jangid Agro Engineering & Anr.Delhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Rabindranath Behera vs. The Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Dinesh Dash vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S.Ishwar Chandra Barik, Keonjhar vs. Commissioner(Appeal), GST, Central Excise And Customs, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026