J.A. FINANCIAL & MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT PVT. LTD.S,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD-13(1), NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT found that the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal without hearing the assessee. Therefore, the ITAT restored the case to the CIT(A) for a fresh hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed ex-parte without a hearing. The assessee then appealed this dismissal to the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing an appeal ex-parte without providing an opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘C’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI N. K. BILLAIYA & SH. YOGESH KUMAR U.S.
This present Appeal is directed against the order passed by CIT(A) dated 14/10/2019 wherein the Ld.CIT(A) has dismissed the Appeal ex-parte without hearing the assessee. The assessee has raised five grounds of Appeal.
When the matter is called neither the assessee nor his representative appeared before us.
We have heard the Ld. DR, perused the material on record and gave our thoughtful consideration. The Ld.CIT(A) dismissed the Appeal without deciding the matter on merit. In our considered opinion, the Ld.CIT(A) committed an error in dismissing the Appeal without hearing the assessee. Therefore, in the J. A. FINANCIAL & MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT interest of justice, we are inclined to restore the file of the CIT(A) with a direction to hear the assessee and passed appropriate order in accordance with law.
Accordingly, the Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose with a direction to the Ld.CIT(A) to dispose of the Appeal afresh by giving an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and pass appropriate order in accordance with law.
In the result, the Appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in the open court on 06th July, 2022.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026