SMT. MAMTA DEVI CHOPRA,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD -6(1), JAIPUR
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee sought withdrawal of the appeal as they had opted for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme' to settle the matter. The Revenue had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2015-16. During the hearing, the assessee submitted an application to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw an appeal after opting for a settlement scheme like 'Vivad Se Vishwas'.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,” B” JAIPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 1210/JP/2019
ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A)-2, Jaipur dated 23.08.2019 for the assessment year 2015-16.
Hearing of the appeal was concluded through video conference in view of the prevailing situation of Covid-19 pandemic.
At the time of hearing, the assessee furnished an application for withdrawal of this appeal. The contention made in the said application reads as under:- Smt. Mamta Devi Chopra vs. ITO “Against the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) of the I.T. Act, 1961 for AY 2015-16 in the case of above assessee and CIT(A) System appeal No.: CIT(A), Jaipur-2/10681/17-18 date of CIT(A) Order: 23.08.2019, certificate No. 715785150111120 u/s 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (3 of 2020) has been received from the office of designated Authority PCIT, Jaipur-2. (copy enclosed/uploaded), therefore the assessee applies for withdrawal of appeal filed in Form No. 36 on 22.10.2019.
Kindly Acknowledge. (Mamta Devi Chopra)” 4. The ld. DR has raised no objection if the appeal of the assessee is allowed to be withdrawn.
Therefore, in view of the fact that the assessee has already approached the department to settle the matter under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme”, we permit the assessee to withdraw this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026