LATE SHRI MILAP CHAND MANTRI,AJMER vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, AJMER

PDF · subscribers
ITA 618/JPR/2018Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 February 2021AY 2012-132 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as they had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2012-13. During the hearing, the assessee requested to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the assessee's appeal could be withdrawn due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES “B”, JAIPUR

Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 618/JP/2018

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Somani (CA) jktLo dh vksj ls@
Hearing: 09/02/2021Pronounced: 10/02/2021

ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A), Ajmer dated 01/02/2018 for the A.Y. 2012-13.

2.

The hearing of the appeal was concluded through video conference in view of the prevailing situation of Covid-19 Pandemic.

3.

At the time of hearing, the ld AR on behalf of the assessee has filed an application for withdrawal of this appeal mentioning the fact that the assessee has opted Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and requested for withdrawal of the present appeal.

1.

2 ITA 618/JP/2018_ Late Sh. Milap Singh Mantri Vs DCIT 4. The ld DR has raised no objection if the appeal of the assessee is allowed to be withdrawn.

5.

Therefore, in view of the fact that the assessee has already approached the department to settle the matter under Vivad Se Vishwas scheme, we permit the assessee to withdraw the present appeal. Accordingly, the appeal of the assesses is dismissed as withdrawn.

6.

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 10th February, 2021.

Sd/- Sd/- ¼foØe flag ;kno½ ¼lanhi x®lkÃa½ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 10/02/2021 *Ranjan आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू vihykFkhZ@The Appellant- Late Sh. Milap Chand Mantri, Ajmer. 1. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- The D.C.I.T. Circle-1, Ajmer. 2. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT 3. vk;dj vk;qDr¼vihy½@The CIT(A) 4. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत 5. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File (ITA No. 618/JP/2018) 6. vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,

सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →