SH. RISHI PAL L/H OF LATE SH. INDER SINGH,NEW DELHI vs. PR. CIT, KARNAL
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that an assessment order passed against a dead person is legally invalid. Consequently, any subsequent proceedings, including those under Section 263, initiated based on such an invalid order are also invalid and liable to be quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessment order under Section 148/143(3) was passed against a deceased individual, Sh. Inder Singh, who had expired prior to the assessment proceedings. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax initiated proceedings under Section 263 against this assessment order.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of an assessment order passed against a deceased assessee and the subsequent proceedings under Section 263 based on that order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Saktijit DeyDr. B. R. R. Kumar
Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member:
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of ld. PCIT, Karnal dated 27.03.2017 passed u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Apropos, the issues raised before us, the pertinent facts are as under:
• 25.02.2014 - Notice u/s 148 was issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Panipat Circle, Panipat. • 09.04.2014 - Notice u/s 142(1) was issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Panipat Circle, Panipat. • 16.09.2014 - Notice u/s 142(1) was issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Panipat Circle, Panipat. • 02.01.2015 - Notice u/s 142(1) was issued by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Panipat.
2 Rishi Pal • 07.02.2015 - Notice u/s 142(1) issued by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Panipat. • 23.05.2015 – The assessee filed return in the name of Rishi Pal L/H of Inder Singh. • 25.02.2015 – The assessee filed copy of death certificate copy of bank statement, copy of the Income Tax Return, copy of death certificate, computation of capital gains before the ITO, Ward-2, Panipat. • 25.02.2015 – Assessment Order u/s 148/143(3) passed by ITO, Ward-2, Panipat. The said order mentions that the assessee has not filed any return of income for the year under consideration and has not paid any tax on capital gain.
The aforesaid Assessment Order has been passed in the name of “Sh. Inder Singh” S/o Bija, Vill.- Chandoli, Panipat who has expired on 26.11.2012. In other words, the Assessment Order which has been subjected to proceeding u/s 263 of the Act was passed against a dead person. Hence, the order passed u/s 148/143(3) is legally invalid. Accordingly, the order passed u/s 263 against a legally invalid order is also invalid, hence, liable to be quashed.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 13/07/2022.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026