Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES “A”, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA Nos. 939 & 938/JP/2018
ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. Both these appeals have been filed by the assessee against the separate orders of the ld. CIT(A)-2, Jaipur both dated 20/06/2018 for the A.Y. 2013-14.
The hearing of the appeals was concluded through video conference in view of the prevailing situation of Covid-19 Pandemic.
At the time of hearing, the assessee furnished an application for withdrawal of these appeals. The contention made in the said application reads as under:
2 ITA 939 & 938/JP/2018_ Sh. Rakesh Kumar Jain Vs JCIT, Jaipur “In respect of above it is most respectfully submitted that the assessee had applied for settlement of dispute with income-tax department in above appeals which has been accepted by Principal Commissioner of Income Tax in Vivid se Vishwas Scheme (copy of form 3 issued by the department is annexed herewith) It is therefore prayed to all permit the assessee to withdraw the above mentioned appeals. Thanking You Yours sincerely Ashish Sharma A/R”
The ld DR has raised no objection if the appeals of the assessee are allowed to be withdrawn.
Therefore, in view of the fact that the assessee has already approached the department to settle the matter under Vivad Se Vishwas scheme, we permit the assessee to withdraw his appeals. Accordingly, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, both these appeals of the assessee are dismissed.