No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 377/JP/2019
ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A)-I, Jaipur dated 22/01/2019 for the assessment year 2010-11.
Hearing of the appeal was concluded through video conference in view of the prevailing situation of Covid-19 pandemic.
The ld. Counsel for the assessee furnished application for withdrawal of this appeal. The contention made in the said application reads as under:- “Kindly refer to the captioned appeal fixed for hearing before the Hon’ble Bench on 26/03/2021. Shri Ghanshyam Sharma vs. ITO In the matter, it is submitted that Form 3 is issued by the CIT in response to application in Form 1 & 2 under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme by the assessee, copy of Form 3 enclosed. It is therefore, humbly requested to please allow the appellant to withdraw the present appeal. Inconvenience caused is extremely regretted. Thanking you, Yours faithfully, (Manish Agarwal) A/R”
The ld. DR has raised no objection if the appeal of the assessee is allowed to be withdrawn.
Therefore, in view of the fact that the assessee has already approached the department to settle the matter under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme”, we permit the assessee to withdraw this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 01/04/2021.