GAURAV NIJHARA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 61(4), NEW DELHI

ORDER PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, AM: (A) This appeal by Assessee is filed against the order of Learned

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for short], dated 29/11/2019 for Assessment Year 2011-12.

Gaurav Nijhara vs. ITO (B) In this case, the assessee filed a letter by expressing the desire to withdraw this appeal. At the time of hearing before us, the Ld. Authorized Representative for the assessee drew our attention to the aforesaid letter and submitted that the appeal may be treated as withdrawn.

(B.1) The Ld. Sr. DR for Revenue expressed no objection against withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee.

(B.2) On perusal of the records, we find that registry had communicated defect to the appellant assessee informing that appeal fee was short by Rs.1108/-. We find nothing on records to show that the defect has been removed or cured by the appellant assessee. Therefore, this appeal being defective, is in any case not maintainable.

(B.2.1) In view of the foregoing; this appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed being withdrawn, and also being not maintainable.

(C) In the result, this appeal is dismissed.

This order was already pronounced orally on 26th July, 2022 in Open Court, in the presence of representatives of both

Gaurav Nijhara vs. ITO sides, after conclusion of the hearing. Now this order in writing is signed today on 26/07/2022.