← Back to search

MEENA JAIN,DELHI vs. WARD 36(1), DELHI

PDF
ITA 2045/DEL/2025[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 June 20252 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES: G : NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL

For Appellant: Shri Sameer Kumar, Proxy Counsel
For Respondent: Shri Narpat Singh, Sr. DR
Hearing: 25.06.2025Pronounced: 25.06.2025

PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:

These appeals are preferred by the assessee against the orders dated
13.01.2025 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), NFAC.

2.

An application for adjournment has been moved today, however, on perusal of the record and on hearing both the sides, we find that the assessee was not served with notices of hearing and a ground No.2 in that regard has been raised that the impugned orders are passed without giving due opportunity of hearing.

ITAs No.2045 & 2046/Del/2025

3.

Although the ld. DR has defended the impugned orders, we find that the assessee is a female and the claim of the ld. AR is that the assessee was not well versed with the computer and was not aware of any notices received. It is also submitted that the assessee’s spouse was continuously ill and died on 09.02.2024. In the light of the aforesaid circumstances, we consider it an appropriate case to give an opportunity to the assessee to contest on merits. The impugned orders are set aside. The issues on merits as well as on law are restored to the files of the ld.CIT(A) who shall give adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee and proceed to decide the appeals in accordance with law. The appeals are allowed, for statistical purposes only.

Order pronounced in the open court on 25.06.2025. (MANISH AGARWAL)
JUDICIAL MEMBER

Dated: 25th June, 2025. dk

MEENA JAIN,DELHI vs WARD 36(1), DELHI | BharatTax