ACIT, CIRCLE- 17(1), NEW DELHI vs. MUTTI FOODS INDIA PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5817/DEL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 July 2022AY 2015-163 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the tax effect was below the monetary limit specified by the CBDT for filing appeals. Therefore, the appeal was not maintainable.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A). The assessee contended that the tax effect involved was below the CBDT prescribed limit of Rs. 50 lakhs.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the appeal filed by the Revenue was maintainable given the low tax effect, as per CBDT circulars.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘E’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA & SHRI YOGESH KUMAR US

For Appellant: Shri K.V.S.R. Krishna, C.A.;
For Respondent: Ms. Rinku Singh
Hearing: 26.07.2022Pronounced: 26.07.2022
1.

This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order dated 27.07.2018 of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–6, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to CIT (Appeals)] for Assessment Year 2015-16.

2.

At the time of hearing, the learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that tax effect involved in this appeal is below the prescribed

ACIT Vs. M/s. Mutti Foods India limit of Rs.50 lakhs, as fixed by the CBDT and requested to dismiss the appeal on account of low tax effect.

3.

Perusal of the aforesaid appeal filed by the Revenue apparently show that the same is having low tax effect as per CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 8th August, 2019, wherein the parties have been directed not to prefer any appeal in case the tax effect is less than Rs.50,00,000/- and this factual position has been fairly conceded by the learned Senior Departmental Representative.

4.

We have heard both the parties and perused the material on record. Perusal of CBDT Circular (supra) shows that monetary limit for filing the appeal by the parties before the Tribunal, Hon'ble High Court and Hon'ble Supreme Court has been revised. In view of the CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 8th August, 2019 having retrospective effect as coordinate Bench of the Tribunal in case of Dinesh Madhavlal Patel [TS-469-ITAT-2019(Ahd)] 2019-TIOL-1556-ITAT-AHM dated 14th August, 2019 has already decided the issue as to the applicability of the captioned circular to the pending appeals in affirmative. We are of the considered view that the aforesaid appeal is not maintainable due to low tax effect i.e. less than Rs.50,00,000/- hence, the aforesaid appeal filed by the Revenue is hereby dismissed having been become infructuous. However, in case, the present appeal is found to be maintainable at any stage for any technical reasons, the Revenue shall be at liberty to seek recall of this order under relevant provisions of law.

ACIT Vs. M/s. Mutti Foods India

5.

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on : 26/07/2022.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →