SHRI CHANDER SINGH,ALWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2-1, ALWAR
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 1338/JP/2018
PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A), Alwar dated 25.09.2018 for the assessment year 2009-
Hearing of the appeal was concluded through video conference in view of the prevailing situation of Covid-19 pandemic. as under:-
“With reference to above, it is to submit that the assessee wants to withdraw the above appeal since he has opted to settle the dispute under Vivad Se Vishwas Act , 2020 for which form No. 3 has been issued by the PCIT, Jaipur-1. Copy of Form No. 3 is enclosed for ready reference.
It is therefore requested that the appeal filed by the assessee be treated as withdrawn.
Thanking you. Yours faithfully, For Kalani & Co.”
The ld. DR has raised no objection if the appeal of the assessee is allowed to be withdrawn.
Therefore, in view of the fact that the assessee has already
approached the department to settle the matter under “Vivad Se
Vishwas Scheme”, we permit the assessee to withdraw this appeal. Order pronounced in the open court on 05/05/2021. ¼foØe flag ;kno½ ¼lanhi xkslkbZ½ (Vikram Singh Yadav) (Sandeep Gosain) ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member Tk;iqj@Jaipur fnukad@Dated:- 05/05/2021. आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू 1. vihykFkhZ@The Appellant- Sh. Chander Singh, Alwar. 2. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- ITO, Ward-2(1), Alwar. 3. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT 4. vk;dj vk;qDr@ CIT(A) 5. विभागीय प्रतिनिधि] आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर@क्त्ए प्ज्Aज्ए Jंपचनत. 6. xkMZ QkbZy@ Guard File {ITA No. 1338/JP/2018} vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@Aेेज. त्महपेजतंत
3