ACIT, CIRCLE- 6(1), NEW DELHI vs. CH2M HILL (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Departmental Representative submitted that the dispute was resolved under the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP). The Tribunal permitted the Revenue to withdraw the appeal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against an order confirming a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for AY 2011-12. The assessee did not appear for the hearing.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue should be withdrawn due to resolution of the dispute under MAP.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘B’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY
ORDER
PER SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This is an appeal by Revenue against order dated 30.07.2019 of learned Commissioner of Income-Tax(Appeals)-44, New Delhi confirming penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income- Tax Act, 1961 pertaining to assessment year 2011-12.
When the appeal was called out for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, drawing our attention to letter dated 11.02.2020 of the Additional CIT, Range-6, New Delhi, learned Departmental Representative submitted, since, dispute arising in the appeal has been resolved under Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP), the appeal is treated to be withdrawn.
Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned Departmental Representative, we permit the Revenue to withdraw the present appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M / S. Mehta And Modi Realty Kowkur LLP vs. Prem Kumar SanghiTelangana · 13 Nov 2026
- Shri. Adbul Rahim vs. The State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 13 Nov 2026
- Sandhyarani Das vs. The Superintendent Of CGST And Central ExciseOrissa · 11 Nov 2026
- M/S.Pitabas Jena,Pokharigaon, Cuttack vs. Supernitendent, Cuttack-Iii, Range, CuttackOrissa · 11 Nov 2026
- Sudarshan Behera vs. Superintendent Angul Circle, AngulOrissa · 11 Nov 2026