RAJENDRA KABRA,DELHI vs. PRCIT-24, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal as they had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal application.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee later filed an application to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw an appeal filed before the ITAT after opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’, NEW DELHI
Before: Dr. B. R. R. KumarSh. Yogesh Kumar US
Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member:
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of ld. PCIT-24, New Delhi dated 30.07.2018.
The has filed an application dated 11.07.2022 to withdraw the appeal and furnished application wherein it was stated as under:
“Respected Sir, It is humbly submitted that the appellant has opted for the scheme under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 in the matter involving the order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act, against which the assessee is in appeal before the Hon’ble Tribunal.
A copy of Form 5 issued by Revenue is enclosed with this letter for ready reference.
In the light of the aforesaid, your honour is humbly requested to kindly permit the appellant to withdraw the present appeal.”
The ld. DR did not object to the petition of the assessee.
In view of the above, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as infructuous. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 31/08/2022.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026