CBS HOLDING (P) LTD.,DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-5(4), NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer for reopening the assessment were vague and indicated a total non-application of mind. Therefore, the reopening was quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for AY 2012-13 arose against the CIT(A)'s order concerning proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The case was called twice, and no one appeared for the assessee, leading to an ex-parte proceeding.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of the reopening of assessment proceedings based on the reasons provided by the Assessing Officer.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Well Trans Logistics India (P.) Lad v. ACTT19 citing166 Taxmann.com 72 · 2024 · HC
- 0 TT J (Hyd.) 6. ACIT Vs. M.M. Sales Agencies 97 TTJ 575 (Jp.) 7. State of Orissa v. J.P. Sikiria & Co. (17 citing312 ITR 166 · 2009 · HC
- Para 44 & 45 and CIT-Central I v. Indo Arab Air Services14 citing64 Taxmann.com 257 · 2015 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘B’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN
Date of hearing 25.06.2025 Date of pronouncement 25.06.2025 ORDER
PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2012-13 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2 [in short, the “CIT(A)”], New Delhi’s order dated 11.05.2018 passed in case no. 10284/16-17, involving proceedings under section 143(3)/147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).
Case called twice. None appears at the assessee’s behest. It is accordingly proceeded ex-parte.
A perusal of the instant case file reveals with the able assistance coming from the Revenue side that there arises the first and foremost issue of validity of the impugned reopening itself wherein the learned Assessing Officer had recorded the following reasons dated 21.02.2015, reading as under: “21.02.2015 Reasons for reopening the assessment proceedings in the case of M/s. CBS Holding Pvt. Ltd. for the A.Y. 2012-13 u/s 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; 1. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS for the Assessment Year 2010-11 and 2011-12. In both the Assessment Years, substantial additions (more than Rs.10 lakhs) have been made to the income of the assessee. However, the assessee did not file its return of income for the Assessment year 2012-13. 2. In absence of any return of income for the AY 2012-13, it is possible that income may have been escaped from assessment. 3. Therefore, I have reason to believe that the assessee has concealed his income by not filing the return of income for the Assessment Years 2012-13.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026