DELHI IRON & STEEL CO. PVT. LTD.,GHAZIABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GHAZIABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the dispute was resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, as evidenced by Form No. 5 issued by the Designated Authority. The assessee's prayer for withdrawal was accepted.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against a penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for AY 2010-11. The assessee subsequently opted to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn as the dispute has been settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA
This is an appeal by the assessee against order dated 11.06.2019 of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-IV, Kanpur confirming penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2010-11.
When the appeal was called for hearing, none appeared for the assesses. However, learned Authorised Representative of the assessee has furnished letter dated 8th August, 2022 seeking withdrawal of the appeal as the assessee has opted for settling the dispute arising in the appeal under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A copy of Form No. 5 issued by the Designated Authority is also attached to the aforesaid letter. Learned Departmental Representative (DR) did not object to assessee’s request for withdrawal of the appeal.
We have heard the learned Departmental Representative and perused the material on record. It is observed, accepting assessee’s declaration filed under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, the Designated Authority has issued Form, No. 5 on 09.02.2021. Thus, for all practical purposes, the dispute arising in the present appeal stands resolved. Therefore, accepting assessee’s prayer, we permit withdrawal of the present appeal.
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result appeal is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court at time of hearing itself i.e. on 16th September, 2022.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026