JAYANTIBHAI P.PATEL,ANKALESHWAR vs. ACIT, BHARUCH CIRCLE-2,, BHARUCH
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH & DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 43/SRT/2019 (AY : 2011-12) (Virtual hearing in Virtual Court)
Jayantibhai P Patel, Assistant Commissioner of 1, Sukhshanati Society, Income Tax, Circle-2, GIDC, Gattu School Road, Bharuch Ankleshwar Vs PAN : AEBPP4502M APPELLANT RESPONDEDNT
Appellant by None Respondent by Shri O P Meena (Sr. DR) Date of hearing 31-08-2020 Date of pronouncement 31-08-2020
O R D E R PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeals-5 [in short “the CIT(A)-5”], Vadodara dated 06/04/2017, which in turn arises against penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) by the Assessing Officer (AO) by order dated 25/03/2020 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2011-12.
The assessee has raised the following grounds:-
“1. CIT(A) has erred in not deleting the penalty on Rs.584500/- being the business development expenditure added by A.O. on account of Unexplained R & D expenses and on account of Non deduction of TDS thereon. The A.O. has levied penalty treating the same as inaccurate
2 ITA No. 43/SRT/2019/AY.2011-12/ Jayantibhai P Patel
particulars and levied penalty U.S.271(1)(c) on the same. CIT(A) has not appreciated facts and retained penalty.
Leavy of penalty being not as per law requested to be delete.
Your appellant requests for leave to add, to delete, to omit, to amend all or any of the grounds of appeal at or before the time of final disposal of the appeal.”
This appeal has taken up for hearing on the application filed by assessee vide application dated 24/01/2019. In the said application the assessee has contended that he has applied under scheme “Vivad Se Vishwas” and has received approval from Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (in short “the PCIT”), Vadodara-3 under Form 3. The assessee prayed for withdrawal of the appeal to enable him for filing of Form 4 of Direct Tax “Vivad Se Vishwas” (VSV). The assessee has also placed on record a copy of Form 3 of “Vivad Se Vishwas” Scheme, Acknowledgement No.456289270110820. Copy of the application for withdrawal of the appeal is also supplied to Revenue for their record.
None appeared on behalf of assessee when the appeal was listed for hearing. The ld. Senior Departmental Representative (Sr. DR) appearing for the Revenue has no objection, if the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn to enable the assessee for filing Form 4 in compliance of “Vivad Se Vishwas” Scheme.
Considering the contents of application dated 24/08/2020 filed by the assessee, the appeal of the assessee in dismissed as withdrawn.
3 ITA No. 43/SRT/2019/AY.2011-12/ Jayantibhai P Patel
Order pronounced on 31/08/2020, as per Rule 34 of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rule 1963. Sd/- Sd/- (DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI) (PAWAN SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Surat, Dated: 31/08/2020 Samanta, PS Copy to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR // TRUE COPY // /True copy/ By order
Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, Surat
