OM PRAKASH,GURGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD 3 (2). GURGAON, GURGAON
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) had not disposed of the legal grounds raised by the assessee. Therefore, the matter was remitted back to the CIT(A) for disposal of the legal grounds after providing an adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A). The assessment was completed under Section 144/147 of the Income Tax Act due to non-cooperation of the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) properly disposed of the legal grounds raised by the assessee? Whether the assessee was granted adequate opportunity of being heard?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘B’: NEW DELHI
(Assessment Year: 2011-12) Om Prakash, vs. ITO, Ward 3 (2), H.No.1A, Vilalge Nakhrola, Tehsil, Gurgaon. Gurgaon – 122 001 (Haryana). (PAN : BYHPP3234P) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri Sandeep Vijh, CA REVENUE BY : Shri Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 26.06.2025 Date of Order : 26.06.2025 O R D E R
PER S.RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT (A)] dated 16.12.2024 for Assessment Year 2011-12.
At the time of hearing, it is brought to our notice that the assessment was completed under section 144/147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) due to non-cooperation of the assessee. Further it was brought to our notice that assessee has raised several legal issues and also raised grounds on merit. It is brought to our notice that ld. CIT (A) has not disposed off legal grounds.
After considering the submissions of both the counsels, we are inclined to remit this issue back to the file of ld. CIT (A) with a direction to dispose off the legal grounds raised
by the assessee after giving adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee. At the same time, we direct the assessee to cooperate with the lower authorities also.
4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on this 26TH day of June, 2025 after the conclusion of the hearing.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026