Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH & DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI
O R D E R PER DR. A. L. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
At the outset itself, Shri Hiren R Vepari, Learned Counsel for the assessee, submitted before the Bench that Assessee Company has opted the benefit of the “Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020”. A copy of Form No. 1 and Form No. 2 under ‘the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, filed by the assessee in the Income Tax Department on 31.08.2020 were also placed before the Bench. Shri Hiren R Vepari, on behalf of the Assessee Company, by way of a letter dated 31.08.2020, submitted that assessee company prayed for withdrawal of the appeal to which, the learned Departmental Representative did not raise any objection.
We have heard both the parties and gone through Form 1 & 2 filed by the assessee to obtain the benefit of ‘Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme’ and noted that assessee company has prayed for withdrawal of the appeal.The Ld. DR for the Revenue did not have any objection if the said appeal is withdrawn by the assessee company. Consequently, we treat this appeal as withdrawn.
/AY.2013-14 Wellington Services Pvt. Ltd
In the result, the appeal of the assessee (in ) is dismissed as withdrawn.