ITO(TDS) WARD-7(2), HYDERABAD vs. SANGITA TRAVEL AGENCY, HYDERABAD
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal due to low tax effect, as it was below the threshold stipulated by CBDT circulars. Consequently, the assessee's cross-objection was also dismissed as infructuous.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A). The assessee also filed a cross-objection against the same order. The appeal was heard through video conferencing.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed on the grounds of low tax effect as per CBDT circulars. The secondary issue was the fate of the assessee's cross-objection in light of the appeal's dismissal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCH “A”, HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI P. MADHAVI DEVI & SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
This appeal is filed by the revenue directed against the order of CIT(A) – 3, Hyderabad, dated 18/10/2019. The assessee is also filed CO against the said order of the CIT(A).
These cases were taken up for hearing on 18-06-2020 through video conferencing and both the parties were heard.
At the time of hearing it has been brought to our notice as per the CBDT Circulars No.03/2018 dated 11.07.2018 and Circular No.17
2 ITA.No. 17/Hyd/2020 & CO No. 4/Hyd/2020 Sangita Travel Agency, Hyderabad. of 2019 dated 9th August, 2019, the tax limit for filing of appeal by the Revenue before the Tribunal has been fixed at Rs.50.00 lakhs. Since the tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs.50 Lakhs, we are dismissing the same on account of low tax effect as apparently the case is not covered by any of the exceptions in the circular. However, the Revenue is at liberty to seek recall of the order, if this case is found to be falling within the exceptions mentioned in the circulars cited above.
As the appeal of revenue is dismissed on account of tax effect, the CO filed by the assessee becomes infructuous and, therefore, the same is dismissed as infructuous and also the cross objections raised in the CO are supporting the order of CIT(A).
In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue as well as CO filed by the assessee are dismissed.
Pronounced in the open court on 18th June, 2020
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- Harinder Singh Rawat vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026