SHREE MANVATA DISCRETIONARY FAMILY TRUST,RAJKOT vs. THE DCIT, CPC, BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal set aside the ex-parte order and remanded the issue back to the CIT(A). The CIT(A) was directed to adjudicate the issue afresh after providing an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and considering all evidence.
What were the facts?
The appeals were filed against an order passed under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(A) had passed an ex-parte order as the assessee did not appear despite notices.
What were the issues?
Whether the ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A) was justified and whether the assessee should be given another opportunity to present their case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED&
Consolidated Appeals (2)
O R D E R PER BENCH: Both the appeals relate to the order under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the act”) passed by the Ld. CIT(A), Jamnagar, for A.Y. 2016-17. Since the issues are identical, these are heard analogously and are being disposed of by a common order. & 121/RJT/2019 A.Y.2016-17 - 2 - 2. It appears that the Ld. CIT(A) has passed the order ex-parte since none appeared in spite of repeated notices served upon the assessee. However, in view of the submission made by the Ld. Counsel appearing for the assessee that another opportunity may be given to the assessee to represent his case before the authorities below, we in order to prevent the miscarriage of justice set-aside the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) to adjudicate the issue afresh upon giving an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and upon taking into consideration the evidences on record and any other evidences which the assessee may choose to file at the time of hearing of the matter and to pass a reasoned order thereon.
In the combined results, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes. This Order pronounced in Open Court on 28/02/2020
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ayush Bamaniya vs. State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Secretary Ministry Of Home AffairsMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Patidar vs. Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Ritik vs. State Of M.P.Madhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Lokesh vs. Bank Of Maharashtra Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Arvind Lunawat vs. Axis Bank LimitedMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026